Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
October 10, 2013
Image Size
317 KB
Resolution
559×720
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
9,460
Favourites
447 (who?)
Comments
58
Downloads
193

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
×
Adorkable by TexasUberAlles Adorkable by TexasUberAlles
Tumblr version here.
Add a Comment:
 
:icondragonjek:
Dragonjek Featured By Owner Dec 13, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
If you search "adorkable" on this site, Twilight is in a full 1/4th of the images on the first page.
Reply
:iconbipole:
bipole Featured By Owner Aug 28, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Ooh, I just might use "fatberg" more often.
Reply
:icontexasuberalles:
TexasUberAlles Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Apparently we have more advanced lexicographical technology than Equestria!
Reply
:icontunder2510:
Tunder2510 Featured By Owner Mar 28, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Twilight, you alone are adorkable! :aww:
Reply
:icondjhiryu508:
DJHiryu508 Featured By Owner Jan 29, 2014
Obviously she didn't check "urban" dictionary.
Reply
:iconbooklovertwilight:
BookLoverTwilight Featured By Owner Feb 10, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I shall look into getting an "urban" dictionary. Thank you. Maybe I have not checked all possible sources.
Reply
:icondjhiryu508:
DJHiryu508 Featured By Owner Feb 25, 2014
Its actually on the internet. No books needed.
Reply
:iconlifeenemy:
LifeEnemy Featured By Owner Jan 6, 2014
Just- dawwwwwwwwwwwww
Reply
:iconmarmarlps:
marmarlps Featured By Owner Nov 30, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Twilight....


You're the definition of adorkable.
Reply
:iconnightwolfeclipse:
NightWolfEclipse Featured By Owner Jan 11, 2014
so truuuue
Reply
:iconya5la:
ya5la Featured By Owner Nov 28, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
lolol :D
Reply
:iconemmanueljmoreno:
emmanueljmoreno Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Yes, there is; Twily's just too adorkable to see it.
Reply
:iconbooklovertwilight:
BookLoverTwilight Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2013  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Incorrect. I believe I double-cross-indexed every page by letter and definition, double checking every section by page number to make sure there were no skipped pages. "Adorkable" is not a word.
Reply
:iconemmanueljmoreno:
emmanueljmoreno Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Hmm, your argument is invalid, because I reject it!
Reply
:iconbooklovertwilight:
BookLoverTwilight Featured By Owner Feb 10, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Rejecting an argument does not make said argument invalid. An actual, concrete counterargument that has a better basis for comparison and also has concrete proof of its evidence and facts makes an argument invalid.

And no, I doubt very much that you can win this argument either, since the counterargument you provide is not a counterargument at all, it is in fact a statement used to get out of the necessity of creating a concrete counterargument.

Two years of reading up on my psychology helps a bunch.

^-^
Reply
:iconquinntus79:
Quinntus79 Featured By Owner Mar 16, 2014
Here's my counter argument. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Have you checked every dictionary of every library in the universe (or the other universes that may be out their). Unless you have, you can't really make the claim that the word does not exist, because it may well be that it does. Not to mention, language is incredibly fluid and in some ways a living thing. Some words go extinct, some adapt new meanings entirely, sometimes new words are born, and sometimes two words synthesize into a hybrid word, as is the case with "adorkable."
 :-)
Reply
:iconberushogun:
berushogun Featured By Owner Nov 16, 2013
oh my gosh that's adorkable!
Reply
:iconcari28ch3:
cari28ch3 Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2013
don't worry Twily, you'll get it someday
Reply
:iconbooklovertwilight:
BookLoverTwilight Featured By Owner Feb 10, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I believe that I already get it. It is what the humans (and Pinkie Pie) call a 'bad pun'. The nature of puns or the variables required to make a pun 'bad' I do not yet understand, if that is what you meant, but I do understand the commonplace usage of the pun (bad or otherwise) "adorkable".
Reply
:icongamerthehedgehog:
GamertheHedgehog Featured By Owner Oct 27, 2013
and this proves exactly why she IS so adorkable
Reply
:icongray--day:
Gray--Day Featured By Owner Oct 27, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Oh Twi, you of all ponies should know that a dictionary is not a list of "real words."

Heh, "real word." That term always amuses me.
Reply
:iconghalaghor:
Ghalaghor Featured By Owner Oct 24, 2013
just wait till the next edition comes out.
Reply
:iconkarkovice1:
karkovice1 Featured By Owner Oct 20, 2013

Give it a couple of years, Twilight!

 

I mean, if they can accept "bootylicious" as a word, why not "adorkable"? =P

Reply
:iconbooklovertwilight:
BookLoverTwilight Featured By Owner Feb 10, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I just checked for the former. It is not in my dictionary. Now, I can understand the reasons behind making "selfie" a word. It is a specific term referring to a picture taken of oneself, as opposed to having a friend take the same picture. A distinction is to be made. However, instead of "adorkable", could you not just say, "nerdy", or something along those lines?
Reply
:iconroninjedi:
roninjedi Featured By Owner Oct 14, 2013  Professional General Artist
What you did there...

I see it.
Reply
:icongarciarael:
garciarael Featured By Owner Oct 13, 2013
Adrokable (adj.) - Being shy, awkward and nerdy, and somehow more attractive and not less.
Reply
:iconcajobif:
cajobif Featured By Owner Oct 12, 2013
Well.... not for now.

Maybe in the next edition.

Beautiful work
Reply
:iconcmc--scootaloo:
CMC--Scootaloo Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
So sure Twilight?
Maybe you should ask Sweetie Belle first, before you say that this word doesn't exist.
Reply
:icondakathi666:
Dakathi666 Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2013
And that just makes you even more "ADORKABLE" Twilight!
Reply
:iconstonehot316:
StoneHot316 Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Adorkable is a real word! >: 3
Reply
:iconcoolclaytony:
coolclaytony Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2013
Pft, scru da dikshunary! Langwage is ment to evolv!
Reply
:iconkarkovice1:
karkovice1 Featured By Owner Oct 20, 2013
Especially with spelling like THAT! :P
Reply
:iconscyphi:
Scyphi Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Give it time, Twilight. It'll be in there eventually. :P
Reply
:iconlesmislover88:
lesmislover88 Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2013
She must be using the wrong dictionary because if she got a modern one, her face would be where "Adorkable" is. :D
Reply
:iconbonesatellite:
BoneSatellite Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2013
That, Twily, is because the dictionary you're using was published before your birth.
Reply
:iconschneelocke:
schneelocke Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2013
Silly Twilight! You're far too intelligent for linguistic prescriptivism. :)
Reply
:iconsonicladiesman11:
SonicLadiesMan11 Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
Heh heh suppose funny. Still nice drawing just saying. XD
Reply
:icondarkestsunset:
DarkestSunset Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
That is adorkable!
Reply
:iconbb-k:
BB-K Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Wow, nice book. :) I love the depth of field you apply. :)
Reply
:icontexasuberalles:
TexasUberAlles Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Figuring out how to convert a black and white scan into black and transparent and learning how to work the Warp tool make books a heck of a lot easier in Photoshop.

I mostly just went with simple soft brush bookshelves out of laziness to keep from having to draw a big library in detail, but you're right, it does give it a deliberate-looking depth of field in combination with the sharper focus on the book's text!
Reply
:iconbioshock140:
Bioshock140 Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013
It will be!!
Reply
:iconragnu:
ragnu Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013
:icondatplotplz: You would think that twilight. And that's why you wouldn't qualify to be a dictionary
Reply
:icontom-addo:
Tom-Addo Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
And that just proves how Adorkable you really are Twilight. Love
Reply
:iconjasan820123:
jasan820123 Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013
Have you checked urban dictionary yet, twi?
Reply
:icontorturedartist745:
TorturedArtist745 Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013
Which means Spike just lost another game of Scrabble.
Reply
:iconjlun2:
Jlun2 Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013
And it only costed you 10 hours of your life to prove it. Was it worth it though? ;)
Reply
:iconhrostami:
hrostami Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013
:lmao:
Reply
:iconjlargent:
Jlargent Featured By Owner Oct 10, 2013
If you want a definition look in a mirror Twi. By the way Happy Birthday.
Reply
Add a Comment: